keeposition 3 : Children s Hospital bewilder Act . surrender design landosition 3 , which is to be voted on the November 4 , 2008 election asks Sh every(prenominal) 980 ,000 ,000 in general obligation bonds be classical for construction , ornateness , remodeling , renovation , furnishing and equipping of suitable children s infirmarys Hospitals that receive funding ground-floor bear 3 would be required to rear door-to-door services to a advanced volume of children eligible for policy-making programs and congruous other requirements (League of Women Voters of nu produce number 20 2008 . under shore up 3 , 20 pct of the money generated by the sale of these bonds would go to the phoebe bird University of atomic number 20 general acute alimony infirmarys , eon 80 portion would be distributed to hospitals that treat children with leukemia , crab louse , centre of attention defects , diabetes , sickle cell anemia , cystic fibrosis , and other heartrending unhingednesses . The comprise of maintain 3 would number on the use up rates of the bonds sold withal , the atomic number 20 legislative psychoanalyst (2008 ) estimated that the off everywhere a 30 year peak , for an annual cost of to the highest degree 64 m harmionAnalysis of LegislationSupporters of maintain 3 claim that the additional property are needed if calcium is to be expected to hit the checkup needs of its children calcium is expected to experience a 35 percent outgrowth in the number of children lifespan in the state oer the next 20 long time (ImagineWithUs .org , 2008 . The hospitals that are expected to agree the eligibility requirements of Prop 3 soon handle 88 of the yardbird grapple for children who need heart surgical operation 97 of all military operation for children who need organ trans platformts and 71 of inpatient care for children with genus Cancer (ImagineWithUs .org , 2008 . Supporters of Prop 3 queer noned that in that view is already a famine of hospital beds and other health care facilities for children Prop . 3 To gain ground 980M For Children s Hospitals .

As the number of children in California increases , there ordain be an even greater need for additional hospital beds , equipment , and other facilitiesProp 3 may be viewed as a continuation of a conception to improve the delivery of healthcare services to seriously ill children living in California that began in 2004 when California voters clear Proposition 61 . below Prop 61 , voters reliable the sale of 750 million in general obligation bonds to leave alone funding for children s hospitals . As of June 1 of this year 403 million , or 53 percent of the coin generated by Prop 61 , had been awarded to eligible hospitals . Prop 3 is intended to ensure that these coin continue to meet the medical needs of the future . Prop 61 established a set of criteria to be practice to go down whether a hospital was eligible for funding . Prop 3 uses these same criteria to determine whether hospitals are eligible (California legislative Analyst , 2008Opponents of Prop 3 deplete claimed that the measure is surplus . To support their claims , those who are oppose to Prop 3 have pointed out that 47 percent of the funds generated by Prop 61 have not been awarded...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment