'Does a Revolution Always Have to Include Terror Essay\r'

'The radical player of the deputation of Public Safety, Robespierre had fanatic and opinionated ideas and beliefs that made him a passionate leader. He believes that to safely go by means of the stormy variation, the mess’s behavior should be regulated by stormy circumstances, and their plans should be establish on the combination of the spirit of revolutionary giving medication and democracy. Virtue, the â€Å"fundamental principle of the democratic government,” was a tender factor of his viewpoint. He thinks that if there is no righteousness in the government, then the plenty’s celibacy can be a source, but when the people be corrupted too, there is no panorama of winning liberty. These ideas did no harm; they were beneficial and precise true.\r\nHowever, he also had radical ideas that were appalling and that weren’t necessarily correct. In his opinion, the people should be lead by reason and the people’s enemies by curse. Robespierr e also mentions that a prevalent government in revolution evolves from rectitude and terror. This is his outlook on virtue and terror: â€Å"virtue, without terror is fatal; terror, without which virtue is powerless.” He says, â€Å"the characteristic of popular government is confidence in the people and severity towards itself.” In other words, the popular government has to have confidence in the people and be strict and severe with itself. According to him, terror is the principle of tyrantic government and he thinks that because of this, the despot whitethorn govern by terror his brutalized subjects and moderate by terror the enemies of liberty.\r\nEven though these are only his opinions, his perspectives on the use of terror and unmercifulness led him to cause the Reign of Terror and at last led him to his execution on July 28, 1794. A revolution doesn’t necessarily have to include terror and the popular government does not have to be ruthless to its people, because then the revolutionaries may lose their supporters (or they may even revolt) and the radicals might have to face to a greater extent enemies. This was true, because Robespierre’s former followers had him arrested and executed, and the day later on the execution, everyone felt relieved. The famous radical leader’s attributes and beliefs led the country into terror and himself to his end.\r\n'