Aqa Food Anthology Essay Example for Free

Aqa Food Anthology Essay comp ar two schoolbooks from the Anthology, which present diverse views about what we should eat.Text 9 is a newspaper hold by John Torode on Why we should e real eat ruby meat that vibrantly explores the issue of eating red meat and with a meat lover perspective fighting a passionate argument against the unskilled boy of British culture reputation meat has. John Torode is a well- go to bedn famous person chef and his examine endorses the article with a sense of knowledge and character smiling for the culmination of his love of beef. This article is written to reach out to the general public, more so to the health conscious and the skeptics to persuade and take on through to a new way of thinking towards eating red meat and food in general. A really similar purpose is seen throughout school text edition 11, the Vegetarian rules of order websites S as yet simple step to going- and staying- vegetarian which aim to guide prospective vegetarians to the ultimatum of you be vegetarian through the use of enabling and reassuring lexis.In text 11 the text is clearly set out into seven step that are structured to coincide, pursual an order to which a structured plan flows like a timeline- building up confidence and hold to the reader with the desired center of easing them in to the direction of becoming vegetarians. This is near like an teaching method manual and by the text being set in steps it is easy for the reader to digest. In comparison the structure of text 9 does not use bullet points but instead is presented in prose, which allows for story telling. counterbalance though the texts are structured differently they are both(prenominal) still informative, demonstrative and possibly convincing.Language techniques are chosen carefully to create these types of texts. For in stead, Torode uses narrative and inclusive language. Torode begins by using first base soul pronouns When I first moved in his anecdote of h is experiences with meat, this creates a person-to-person, colloquial effect almost as if he is revealing himself to you making him more likeable and warm, and this is legitimate throughout the text as he carries on telling us how hed been raised on the forget making him seem like a down to earth guy who the reader can combine with.Later on in the article Torode employs inclusive language Why? Because we eat too over oft, in this example Torode also uses rhetoric possibly with the purpose of persuading as it makes the reader think and is a transition to his argument to why this is true. To end the article Torode slips back into the more personal first person narration much like the formalities of a conversation. There is a change of direction in the text from the anecdotal and friendly tone to where he gets serious and then back to very personal and reassuring- this is all formed to be persuasive as the personal address is comforting and the serious facts are used to further pe rsuade the reader.The Seven Steps lack some of the fore mentioned techniques. What can be seen instead is a third person narrative throughout the article, thus making it sound little personal but more instructive and informative. The writer uses a brisk selection of lexis making the sentences and hearty body of text shorter than text 9. Even though this text is significantly shorter it still manages to come crosswise as c oncerned and helpful or borrow one from your local library, here its almost like a whisper as if the voice is matched to someone friendly doing you a favor.So even though text 11 is not as colloquial and expressive as text 9 it still uses language in a way that makes it seem slightly informal, neutral and relaxed for the effect of appear reassuring and therefore persuasive. For example the personal caption under the picture of the woman also uses first person pronoun I gave up meat and even uses informal language such as vegetable to seem relatable and also down to earth- just like Torode is trying to sound. This is seen in both texts as a technique to warm to the reader and draw their interest.In text 9 we see a consistent use of expressive lexis which displays passion from the narrator as he tells us we ate platters of it and I love it. He tells us about my love affair with beef using an array of adjectives (large, smoky, well marbleized join of beef) and alliteration (succulent steak) to entice the readers imagination and glorify meat in bide of his argument of Why we should all eat red meat. Combined with the use ofhyperballys and negative hyperbole (cholesterol overdose) when speaking of the opposing argument it radiates a consistent sense of passion plump for up by authoritative facts. All in all creating a very impressive, persuasive argument.How the Vegetarian Societys Seven simple steps does try to persuade and guide the reader is quite different from the why we should all eat red meat article in terms of language use. As it i s a step-by-step guide it doesnt include a personal story or emotive language like in Torodes article. Instead it uses imperatives and suggestions, (try something new) in every step and modal(a) verbs throughout in a simplistic manner. Perhaps because it doesnt need to be as persuasive since it is aimed at the already prospective vegetarian and therefore it is not opinionated or overly supporterizing in any way. The effect of this is that a calm tone is created and each step simply guides the reader- the persuasion is much more subtle.Whilst language is chosen to include and instruct it is also chosen to discriminate against the opposition to pass possible doubts and reassure the reader, this is used in both texts. In Torodes article he declares, unskilled customers still worry that here it mocks those who worry about BSE and what it might do. A superior stance is taken here in order to persuade. In text 11 it is strikingly similar as it tells the reader dont be put off by ill-in formed scare stories from people who know very little about their own health. Both of these bias declaratives are used to- once again- effectively comfort and assure the reader.Although not so inclusively as text 9, text 11 uses celebrity endorsement in the form of a picture of Sir Paul McCartney a musician and vegetarian society patron almost like a figure head that is encouragement for readers to think that it is more acceptable to ensue the views of what we should eat according to them because these famous people do. The rhetorical question posed by Sir Paul apparently, captioned under the picture is a touch to make the reader think, the words sound wise and are rigid there to enliven such thoughts to the reader.This is also seen in text 9 towards the end of the article when Torode very personally tells us My family eatswhich he makes very personal even telling us his childrens names. Torode is using himself as a figure head to the views on what we should eat as after all he i s this celebrity chef and if it is good enough for his family- it should be good for us?In conclusion the texts contest completely different views on what we should eat but the sought effect on the reader is very similar and this is why there are similarities in the way the texts both try to persuade. They are both different types of texts and therefore the language, tone and techniques vary- text 9 uses a more personal and complex uprise in the form of a personal narrative to persuade the reader and create an impressive argument, whilst text 9 is a much more simplistic and subtle informative text.They are both systematically persuasive and lead to the final purpose- of leading, encouraging and informing the reader through a set of steps or a structured narrative to a new view of what we as the reader should eat. Even though Text 9 is more opinionated both texts are still biased arguments with in general the purpose of persuasion. I think both texts are very suited to their purp ose and although look and are different they interestingly use language for a very similar purpose.