'Arab Americans\r'

'The biggest consideration in any exploit to infiltrate the fri checkship is the legal and estimable issues that would govern those actions. Immigrants have rights and they must be respected in the estate. It’s essential that these citizenry would know that the government prise them as persons and as citizens of the States. in that location be constitutional rights that must non be broken; new(prenominal)wise, no immigrant in the plain would invariably feel safe. There ar already many crimes against their race and I wouldn’t indigence to add to that list. I commit in getting their depone in give for them to cooperate and endure true-blue to the country.Loyalty nates’t be bought nor can it be forced. It has to be their closing to express loyalty to a country that treats them well. Ethical issues need also be taken into account. For instance, would it be right for me to exploit into people’s conversations even if those persons ar exem plary citizens and have been positive contri entirelyors to the friendship? If in that respect ar epochs when it is suddenly necessary to spy on e actually(prenominal) person in the immigrant population, then, it go out be done so long as needless deaths pass on be prevented. As for sending agents, I believe it is a must to have down the stairscover people among them in order to filter place the rotten tomatoes.The undercover work’s goal is to identify, without a doubt, who are propagating revolutionary ideas in the comm building blocky. Once identified, these people result be given the appropriate punishment under the fairness. The most important percentage I could play in the community is to move in sure that even the immigrants and the Arab Americans will non become unwitting tools of frightists. 2. establish on the reading assignments, what status, rights and protections would you afford some(prenominal)body who was an American citizen captured in the coupled States in the act of fearistic wildness?How about soulfulness who was a foreign study go after in terrorism in the United States? An American citizen fights American forces abroad? A foreign national, but not a member of a nations legions, flake American forces abroad? Would torture of any of these subjects ever be secureified if it could save lives? American Citizen An American citizen captured in the country rehearseting terroristic violence will be captured and imprisoned under the districts of law. Since it can be considered treason to commit acts of terror in one’s country, then that person will not have the rights of a common prisoner.Foreign subject field A foreign national committing terroristic bodily function in the country will be detained depending on the Attorney General’s mandates, and will be tried any inside the country or outback(a) it. The hearing would likely be sooner a military tribunal. American Citizen struggle American Fo rces Abroad If the American citizen fighting American forces abroad will be captured, he will be toughened as a prisoner of fightfare provided that he meets the criteria provided for in the Geneva Convention. He will have the rights of a prisoner of contendfare and will be treated accordingly.Foreign guinea pig Fighting American Forces Abroad A foreign national who is not a member of a military unit will be accorded a prisoner of state of war status until such time that his status will be driven by the appropriate tribunal. If the foreign national turns out to be a terrorist, then, he will be punished the track terrorists should be punished in agreement to law. 3. What are the different perspectives concerning tho war? Can the war on terror be properly characterized as a sightly war? Under what batch would fighting terrorism cease to be in force(p)?why? The different perspectives of Just war are: • Just War is only permissible as a last resort when all(prenomina l) other non-violent means have been exhausted. • A war can only be precisely if it is conducted by who society deems to have the dresser to do so. • Just war happens to improve the premature committed against society. • To fight a war that does not have a chance of succeeding is not provided. • The last-ditch goal of just war is the re-establishment of peace. • It is just war if the violence in the war is proportionate to the injury endured.• A just war does not target civilians and all efforts must be made so as not to harm civilians. The war on terror can be considered just because the proper authorities are out to get the villains in order to sack the society safe for the citizens. Terrorists do not discriminate amongst military and civilian targets, as such, they must be stopped to avoid the killings of civilians. Fighting terrorism ceases to be just when the country has jeopardise citizens in the process. For example, if the U. S.wi ll remove the whole of Afghanistan in war just because the Al substructure had its beginnings in that country won’t be just. It’s not handsome to generalize that every Afghanistan is a terrorist. Also, war will become unjust if the wrong people are targeted by the authorities. arrange for example that every person plan of attack from the Middle East and who looks like Osama store Laden will be detained by authorities because of how they look, then, that action is not just anymore. It is already a discrimination against private persons. 4. How serious is the problem of anti-Americanism here at home?Should people be responsible for inciting violence when they glorify violent acts against America but themselves do not engage in it? What remedies are available to the government, if any, to give out with instructs, mosques, and charities that indirectly support terrorism term not actually engaging in it? What should the remedies be? Anti-Americanism in the United States is a batch on issues that involve the presence of process in Iraq, the operations in Afghanistan and spheric warming. Many Americans do not want the American troops to continue universe in Iraq.There are constant protests and demonstrations request the government for the troops’ withdrawal. At the uniform time, the government’s campaign in Afghanistan is viewed by many citizens to be immoderate and should be stopped. Many American Muslims believe that putting all of the blame on Osama bin Laden and his group is not right. There are also a lot of demonstrations and protests calling for the government to do something about global warming. Meanwhile, Pipes (2005) reports that some American Muslim schools have been breeding things that equal to being anti-American.As an example, an American-Muslim student told the Washington note in 2001 that for him, being American is just about where he was born, and it does not narrow down him. Some schools are also t eaching things against the Jews, while promoting the supremacy of Islam. Pipes relates that a textbook in a Muslim school in Virginia has stated that only Islam is the accepted religion, and all others are false. First graders are easily influenced and reading this text would make them believe that people who are not Muslims are inferior to their race.The government, especially the tuition ministry, has to take a direct mastery over what materials are being taught in schools. The schools must not be allowed to focalize too much on religion. There must be a law prohibiting minority schools to engage in activities or teach lessons that would indirectly support and stir terrorism. 5. Give your overall assessment of the the States PATRIOT ACT. Do you think it has contributed to the deficiency of terror attacks in the United States since 9/11? If you were in Congress, would you vote to transmigrate the act as is?Would you change anything? Why or why not? in front the USA ultran ationalistic human action was passed into law, electronic surveillance had to undergo a lot of red tape before it can be approved. Sharing of information between intelligence units and law enforcement agencies was very restrain because the law does not say to what consummation should information be shared. This could have resulted to preoccupied opportunities to prevent acts of terror in the country. When the superpatriotic Act was enforced, every ground rule was established on how information will be obtained and shared.Surveillance of every information, financial or otherwise, became permissible. Even phone conversations can be tapped into. Because of this, the terrorist groups have to devise new slipway of communicating, which possibly thwarted go on acts of terror after 9/11. In this sense, the patriotic Act is able to curtail further terroristic activities in the country. There are, however, some part of the Act that speaks of human rights violations. For instance, ind efinite appreciation of immigrants is not reasonable. It would strike fear in the hearts of those who are being loyal and good citizens of America.While the innocent would fear the Act, it would make terrorists wary of committing acts of terror. They would have to be very clever to go unnoticed. Overall, the Patriotic Act has served its purpose despite flaws in some of its contents. If I were a member of Congress, I would vote to renew the Patriotic Act. It may not be perfect but it has kept the country relatively unfreeze of terror attacks after 9/11. However, there would be some changes on the Act, which addresses moot issues like indefinite detentions, secret trials, and handsome vast powers to the executive branch.As a popular country, it is important that the laws of democracy would not be forgotten in the quest to end terrorism. References Ferraro, V. Principles of the Just War. Mount Holyoke College. Retrieved August 17, 2008, from http://www. mtholyoke. edu/acad/intrel/ pol116/justwar. htm Pipes, D. (2005, frame in 29). What Are Islamic Schools Teaching? new-sprung(prenominal) York Sun. Retrieved August 17, 2008, from http://www. danielpipes. org/article/2489 USA Patriot Act (H. R. 3162). Retrieved August 17, 2008, from http://www. personalinfomediary. com/USAPATRIOTACT_Text. htm\r\n'